Liberal Media Bias

et

The MSM’s refusal to provide Fair and Balanced coverage to the GOP has confounded Conservatives since the 1980s.  For the first 20 years, the media just denied their bias.  Anyone who mentioned media bias was treated like a conspiracy theorist.  Then in 2000, the media mask began to slip after the Bush election victory.  For all their histrionics about the big lie and election integrity.  The American Socialist began to undermine American election integrity after the 2000 election.  Their coverage was less obnoxious for a brief period after 9-11, but that was very short-lived. 

 No matter what Bush did, it was “Bush lied, people died.”  Endless investigations and constant social unrest and political posturing.  The attacks did not stop until 2008.  Any pretense of unbiased/fair reporting on the DNC and GOP evaporated when Obama was elected.  The media fell into a fawning orgy of sycophantic bootlicking for Barrack Obama.  The Socialists were going to transform the evil American Empire fundamentally.  After all, just like Joe Biden said when describing him,  “Barrack Obama is a clean, articulate African American.”  No racism there.  LOLOL, Obama was the left’s anointed messiah.  Only partly because of the color of his skin.  Don’t misunderstand here.  I am not saying they didn’t love Obama’s Socialist upbringing and his Marxist leaning.  But for the first time, the Socialists had a candidate whose skin color could be used to shut down every political challenge.  If you disagreed with Obama, it was because you were a Jim Crow racist, and nothing is worst than being called a racist.  The GOP reacted to Obama as they have since they lost to LBJ’s Great Society Initiative in the 1960s. Back then, the media cast the GOP as racists unwilling to help minority America. By sheer repetition of that media narrative, the label still weights heavy around the neck of every GOP Conservative.  Terrified by the possibility of a repeat, the GOP reacted like a bunch of cowardly little schoolboys and vain little girls through Obama’s two terms.  In retrospect, one can hardly believe the GOP is the party of men like Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt, but that is a subject for another time. But back to the issue at hand. 

Fox News ran a recent Article about Democrat versus GOP coverage.  It was refreshing to see the Socialist Democrats be honest.  The liberal media finally came clean after 40 years of denials about Liberal bias in the media.  In this piece, they finally air the lack of ethics and sheer disdain for the GOP.  Their excuses for utterly abandoning their professional ethics are sophomoric. The histrionics would make for a genuinely entertaining comedy skit if they weren’t so dangerous to our democracy—one other telling no so subtle observation.  Socialist Democrats will always telegraph the object of their next attack by accusing the opposition of attacking it first. 

Historically every failed Socialist revolution around the world starts with accusing society of lacking the virtues of true democracy.  True Democracy, they say, is the only prescription to root out such pernicious evil.  This construct is, on its face, an utter lie, and Socialists know it, but it makes for a great political slogan.  There is nothing so brutal as absolute democracy.  One only needs to conduct a cursory review of the French Revolution to realize its dangers.  This is why the Socialists have stopped teaching history.

So how does any of this impact Liberal MSM bias?  It is essential to understand the magnitude of the change the Socialist wish to impose; however, a simple deconstruction of the Liberal safety, compassion, and justice myth is the key to a foundational understanding of the blatant Liberal bias we see expressed in every so-called news story printed or aired these days.   

Simply put, the members of the Liberal media know the Socialist Democrats cannot win on the strength of their ideas or their arguments.  Democratic Socialists have dominated the entire city government in many U.S. cities for 50 to 60 years.  The quintessential question is what successes can Democrat Socialist point to.  Detroit, Milwaukee, Chicago, NYC, Atlanta, New Orleans, Houston, Dallas, Portland, Seattle, San Francisco, LA, etc.   If you were a Liberal Elitist, which one of these Liberal utopias would you choose to showcase your successes.  The real issue is after six decades of rule, Socialist policies have done nothing but make poverty worse, homeless worse, drug addiction worse, and minority unemployment worse.  By every measure, these cities are worse off for being governed by Democrat Socialists.  In the light of this, it is simple to understand why the Liberal media feels they must vilify the GOP. 

When a political party can’t compete in the areas of ideas, its only recourse is to demonize its opposition.  The Liberal media can’t provide equal, fair coverage of the GOP.  If they did, the Democrat Socialist would never win another election.  

Celebrating Our Differences

Philosophically Profundity or Psycho-Babble

By: ET

I truly do not understand the concept of celebrating our differences.  While it makes for a great political slogan, in reality, it is an oxymoron.  The concept, on its face, is divisive, destructive, and xenophobic.

The concept is sold as some kind of political big tent where all divergent cultures are welcome, but in fact, it is merely a political stunt used to buy votes.    

Cultures don’t peacefully coexist by celebrating the very things that make their cultures different.  The only way an educated polite society can evolve into a cohesive civilization is for individual cultural groups to celebrate the values that the larger homogenous civilization shares.     

In any societal setting, a single social sub-group that focuses solely on its cultural uniqueness as it relates to the larger civilizations, in which it exists, tends toward xenophobic attitudes.  They remain closed off from the evolution of the larger civilization as a whole.  Focusing solely on the uniqueness of the individual cultures blocks the individuals and their children from the shared over aching values of the larger group.  Hence the smaller groups never fully homogenize into the larger civilization. 

We see this in immigrant communities where there is virtually no English spoken.  Street signs are printed in either a different language or an altogether different alphabet. 

Some cultures are so alien that there is no possible way to celebrate their differences.  One example would be clitorectomies being performed on young girls so that they will never enjoy sex or even be able to have an orgasm.  I ask you.  Is that a cultural difference that we can all celebrate? This is only one of a multitude of cultural differences that are impossible to celebrate.  Indian tribe known as the Totopara in the Alipurduar district of West Bengal India were known to kill firstborn children, if they were female, by throwing them off of the cliffs.  Again, is that a cultural difference we should celebrate, or attempt to change.  In today’s politically charged America being appalled by that kind of behavior would make you a racist.  By that measure, should we help them to climb higher on the cliffs or should we try to change that kind of backward thinking? 

I am by no means saying all divergent cultures are this extreme; however, as you study history and the cultures from around the world you would be very surprised.  Something not so quite extreme, but equally foreign to me is the fact that only recently have women in some middle eastern countries been allowed the privilege of learning to drive a car.  Should we then celebrate the subjugation of women? Is it racist of me to be happy women trapped in these cultures are being allowed at least a modicum of autonomy in their own lives?

There is a moral line that one cannot cross in many instances when it comes to cultural norms.  We have our cultural idiosyncrasies that I am sure would be totally foreign to people from other cultures.  Women in the free western countries wear revealing clothing and do not cover their heads unless they are wearing a stylish hat, or the weather requires it.  I am sure that kind of behavior would shock many cultures around the world.  So, there is a question that comes to mind in this kind of situation.  Are those cultures shocked by western women’s dress and demeanor being intolerant if they require women who visit those countries to cover their heads and dress appropriately when out in public, or are they racist for wanting their cultural norms respected?

There cannot be two standards.  If it is appropriate for visitors to very conservative traditionally Muslim countries respect the cultural norms of the societies they are visiting or immigrating to, then it is certainly reasonable to require visitors to western countries to comport with the cultural norms of the countries they are visiting or immigrating to.  It is not racist, hateful, or intolerant.  It is just common sense. 

This brings me to the crux of the problem.  When we say that it is racist and xenophobic to value your cultural norms above others, what cultural norms should be adhered to in a homogeneous civilization. If anything,  there are innumerable disparate cultural norms that any inclusive civilization has to tolerate.  However, mere toleration of a cultural uniqueness doesn’t create a cohesive polite society in which to exist, do business, raise children, live, and prosper.   

Wouldn’t it be a more reasonable notion for any large homogenous civilization to adopt simple values dear to most if not all of the disparate cultures represented?  Once those values are defined and codified it becomes incumbent upon every disparate group to adopt and respect those cultural norms. 

This is, by no means, to say that unique cultures must abandon their uniqueness in any real way.  It merely requires them to adopt the cultural norms and mores of their new home and respect them. 

It has always confounded me that people from oppressive, corrupt, downright evil cultures immigrate to a free open democratic society and bring all of their anger and hate with them.  Immigrating to a new country and insisting it become your old country seems to be utterly schizophrenic.  If you enjoyed living in a corrupt, socially restrictive, overbearing theocracy why immigrate.   

We can only celebrate the cross-cultural hierarchy of values shared around the world. 

1)      Everyone speaking an agreed-upon language writing laws and doing business.   

2)      Murder is wrong. Respect the lives of others. 

3)      Stealing property from others who have acquired it through hard work is wrong.

4)      Respect for the elders of our society is good

5)      Respect for fair play in business and personal dealing

6)      The love we all feel for our children.

7)      Respect for true quantitative scientific research regardless of the political ramification.

8)      Respect and adherence to quantitative scientific education untainted by political propaganda

9)      A universal respect for the truth at all costs.

10)   Respect for transparency in government

This list is by no means exhaustive, but it’s a good start.  

The Speaker of the house radical leftist Nancey Pelosi: charged with the responsibility of protecting the Justices attempted to use The newly written Bill designed to protect the Justices as an opportunity to tack on gun restrictions amendments.  When the bill failed to pass with the amendments, she just walked away from the table leaving the Supreme Court Justices unprotected by the measure.  A quickly constructed patchwork of security using US Marshalls was put in place after the would-be assassin was arrested.  It would have to suffice after Nancy failed to get the bill passed in the lower chamber.  When questioned by the press regarding the lack of movement on the bill, she very nonchalantly told the press that the patchwork protection of Justices was quite sufficient.  “No one is in danger because we were unable to get a bill passed today,” were her words.  It is strictly illegal to protest with the intent of intimating a sitting Supreme Court Justice.  So, one has to ask, why the DOJ is allowing the protesters to remain at the homes of these judges.  Who knows Garland’s motivation but, one lucky enabled psychopath might just get Biden another pic for the Supreme Court? Who knows Meritless Garland might be the nominee if helps a psychopath murder Justice Kavanaugh? 

This was to be expected when you consider the radical Liberals and their allies in the mainstream media have been using to vilify conservatives in print and on-air for 5 straight years.  Conservatives are labeled White Supremacist, Nazis, misogynistic, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and are just downright “deplorable” in every way.  The outrageous incendiary rhetoric of the Left is coming home to roust.  Yet Facebook, Twitter, and the like refuse to censor content that is baseless hate speech.   If a conservative has the temerity to voice an opposing opinion, Democrats and their operative in the media engage in a full-scale propaganda campaign of vilifying them with Leftist hate speech 24 hours a day 7 days a week directed at the conservative.  Repeating unfound lies, misinformation, and half-truths.  The liberal media parce every syllable of each conservative speech to twist every word to fit their warped narrative.  They hide behind the 1^st Amendment, which for Liberals is absolute.  However, it is not so absolute if you are a conservative subject to the Liberal thought police.  

Meanwhile, all of the major Democrat-run cities are in flames socially and economically.  I use the term in flames in a metaphorical sense for the most part; however, in the case of Seattle Portland, Milwaukee, DC, and many other blue cities the term could be applied quite literally. 

All of this suffering in these places can be traced back to 60 years of Democrat policies that were ushered in when LBJ signed welfare legislation.  But that’s a different topic much too cumbersome to tackle here.  That’s a book on its own, so back to the issues at hand.

We have only recently heard reporting on the gun violence and murders in the Liberal utopias Chicago, New York, LA, Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta, Houston, DC, etc.etc.etc. because the Left has given the mainstream media lackeys the go-ahead to report on it.  Reporting on it now while the country is devastated by the heinous school shooting in Uvalde Texas gives the impression that the whole country will be consumed in a huge cloud of black powder smoke if something is not done “RIGHT NOW”.

The timing of this wall-to-wall blitzkrieg of coverage on gun violence, gun violence, and “Oh did you hear about the recent gun violence” is in no way coincidental.  Remember Rahm Emanuel’s famous quote.  “Never let a great tragedy go to waste”.    The Democrats believe pounding on gun violence at this exact moment in history with help them get the votes in Congress to gut the Bill of Rights which they have wanted since Woodrow Wilson. 

Never mind, all the gun laws passed in Liberal Democrat utopian enclaves have failed miserably.  Never mind some very simple relatively inexpensive policy changes would change the paradigm of school safety and protection.   Liberals have been blocking that kind of legislation for years.  They need mass shootings and the bodies of dead kids to get the guns pure and simple. 

The weekly carnage I just enumerated above has been going on for decades in Democrat-controlled cities.  So ask yourself “Why now”? Why has the Liberal MSM been silent until now?  It may well be they have stayed clear of reporting on the absolute carnage torturing our blue cities because to report on gun violence in cities controlled by Democrats and running for the enrichment of Democrats with very restrictive gun laws would undermine the Liberal narrative that restrictive gun laws solve gun violence because the so obviously do not.  Restrictive gun laws do not affect gun violence.  Just not the effect the Liberal would have you believe.  The gun-free zones on school campuses created by Liberals have created killing fields for cowardly psychopaths who know no one can shoot back.  That has been one very distinct and measurable effect of GUN CONTROL and GUN-FREE ZONES. However; don’t you dare mention it.  You are a monster if you mention what effect the Liberal GUN FREE ZONE policy has created. 

 Criminals don’t follow the newly improved infringements on the 2^nd Amendment because it’s a law.  Liberal’s ignorance of the issue is well illustrated in a statement by Feinstein Democrat California.  “Once the criminals realize that no one else has a gun they will put down their guns”.  It is hard to believe a person so singularly spared the ravages of intelligence would be given any power at all.  I believe, most psychiatrists would deem that statement delusional and recommend medicating the patient or institutionalization. 

When it comes to talking about guns, don’t ever try to debate, or entreat Liberals with facts.  Recently I found out that not only are facts racist, but scientific data is as well, and the truth is the new HATE SPEECH.  Anything or anyone who questions the Liberal Gospel with truth, facts,  and scientific evidence are vile nonbelievers who must be destroyed by any means necessary.    Racist hate-filled negotiations with facts, data, and truth will not be tolerated.  If you try you will be canceled.  Your first violation will be met with swift and certain justice on social media.  You will be banned.  If possible you will be destroyed personally and professionally.  If you persist Liberal might send protestors to your door by Doxing your leaked home address.  It’s done to create headlines and intimidate you into being silent or in this case changing a Supreme Court Decision.  If you refuse to back down they will send their BROWNSHIRTS (ANTIFA) to your neighborhood to burn it down.  If that’s not possible, there is always the lone crazy gunman with multiple magazines of ammo, a razor knife, and zip ties as in the case of Justice Kavanaugh.  BE WARNED. 

The news blackout on gun crime in most blue cities has kept most Liberals in the dark for at least the last decade.  Consequently, when they hear, the truth it challenges their whole worldview.  It makes them angry at the messenger.  Now that the liberal elite has successfully designated opinion rooted in, fact, scientific data, or the truth, racist no self-respecting Liberal is going to listen to you “YOU’RE A RACIST”.  Consequently, Liberals stay comfortably ensconced in their echo chamber.  They only consume Liberal propaganda carefully spoon-fed to them by the legacy “mainstream” media.  Everything else is vile hateful Racist blasphemy.

If you doubt me, engage any Liberal about the riots of 2020.  Most will insist there were no riots in 2020.  That was civil disobedience in its purest form.  Those were “peaceful demonstrations”.  The destruction of billions of dollars of private property, murders, beatings,  and arson that consumed huge swathes of blue-state cities was merely the product of  “peaceful demonstration”, and it’s their right to peacefully demonstrate.  Any attempt to stop them is a clear and present danger to our Democracy.    Laughable really. 

If you do, by some miracle, happen upon a Liberal with a modicum of intellectual honesty, they will admit to the riots and violence, but in the next breath, they excuse it.  One liberal who engaged me said.  “Ok, so there was some violence, and some property destroyed, but it wasn’t that bad.  With change there is always some destruction”.  To fully grasp the severity of the situation the country is in we have to admit that devout Liberals worship Socialist Doctrine like the faithful believe the Gospels.  Their Doctrine is morally superior to the crass, unfair, evils of Capitalism. In their crusade to right all of the wrongs they perceive in the world, they are absolved of any guilt or responsibility because they are only trying to make the world a safer, happier, fairer, and more peaceful place for everyone.  So, no matter what the level of violence, murder mayhem, or misery, they inflict on others, it will be worth it in the end.   Remember, it is all being done for your good.  You are so ignorant and pathetic you need them to show you the way.  You know the way to enlightenment.  The Orwell novel 1984 kind of enlightenment.  They will help you to see the truth even if it kills you. 

Additionally, you will notice liberals never have any skin in the game.  It’s never their business being looted.  It’s the crass, evil capitalist store.  It would be sacrilege to destroy their little mom-and-pop government-mandated abortion clinic / spare baby parts store,  They are devout Liberals, and it’s a women’s right to murder her unborn child if she wants to SCIENCE be damned you science denier you.  It is never their mother beaten, or their brother murdered, so they are always able to rise above the raw selfish, greedy emotions of others in the situation and interject some real wisdom like” Ban All Guns” or “NO Justice NO Peace”.  Because in their warped view they believe it will work.  It hasn’t worked anywhere, but that is just a far distant whisper of a footnote and not relevant.  “BAN ALL GUNS”.  They say it louder and louder.  When screaming doesn’t work, they resort to “justified” violence because after all with any real change comes some destruction.    

The Liberal playbook is rather paltry.  It does not stand up to scrutiny.  But facts and the truth are the new Hate Speech so there is that.  LOL   One would think the Republicans would push back and call out their blatant Liberal policy failures 24 7, but they never do. Like simpering starving children, they approach the headmaster and quietly request more gruel when they are hungry.  Most of the Republicans go along to get along while filling their coffers till retirement.  The Republican mantra is we tried… Honest injun we tried.  Re-elect us so we can try and fail again pleaseeeeeeeeeeee.  They are cowards of the first order.  Honestly, we should all be asking ourselves why the Rino’s torpedo every real positive real legislative victory but that topic could fill a book.

One other issue I feel helps illustrate my point I my point is poverty and homelessness.  Everyone has got to agree that no one talks about poverty and homelessness as much as Liberals.  They own all the compassion for the poor.  The Blue Cities are overrun with the poor and homeless so it must be true.  They care so much more deeply than those evil vile conservatives, and their proof: they talk about it.  They throw other people’s money at it. Never mind their policies are dismal failures by every possible measure.  The facts are irrelevant.  They care and you don’t, so they are better than you end of the story. 

They do everything they can to requisition other people’s property and wealth to help the poor and homeless. Liberals are notorious for not paying their fair share in taxes and donating little to nothing to the poor and the homeless, but in their minds, they are the only good, moral, and upstanding political party fighting for the poor.  To liberals, talking about it and blaming others for the problem is enough.  They never feel the need to give say 10% of their income to the God Church of Government for the poor and homeless, but they feel their suffering so deeply.   Lots of them don’t even pay their fair share of taxes but they are so moral and upstanding… THEY CARE.  You or I on the other hand would be in jail for income tax evasion. 

However, the magic bullet on which all Liberal policy seems to rest is Wealth Distribution.  They truly believe it would solve all the problems of the world.   We have been hearing about the redistribution of wealth for the last 60 years in one way or another.  It is the only play in their book.  To a carpenter whose only tool is a hammer, every problem is a nail.   Liberals think, in a nutshell.  Mine you, Liberal millionaires and billionaires are not lining up to devest themselves and work alongside the proletariat.  That’s their plan for us serfs. 

One last thing I feel compelled to mention is the conversation I had with my Liberal debate opponent truly bothered me in retrospect.  After some time ruminating on his argument and the way he obfuscated and excused Liberal violence.  His language became a chilling reminder to me.  One sleepless night I came upon a documentary about the Holocaust.  The Allies, as part of documenting the Holocaust,  conducted interviews with German civilians after the war after the camps were liberated.  Even the civilians living less than 10 kilometers from the death camps testified that they were innocent. In every interview, the respondent assumed zero responsibility for the atrocities committed by their National Socialist German Workers Party (NAZI Party) Simply put they weren’t guilty. They absolved themselves of all responsibility. They convinced themselves they were innocent.   Even those who lived close enough to smell the rotting corpses and the acrid stench of the burning flesh of the crematoriums believed themselves to be innocent.  They didn’t know what that awful smell was and they never went to investigate, so they were innocent.  After all, every great change brings with it some destruction. 

I wanted to take a moment to thank everyone who visited my blog in the last 12 months.  I have had a great deal of challenges in the last year, so as you might imagine I have not been blogging very much.  Honestly, I didn't think anyone was reading it. When I stopped by to just check on the blog, I was stunned to find 242 pages of emails at 10 emails per page.  I am not sure I where I am going to find the time to answer all 2420 emails, but I am going to do my level best to thank each and ever yone of you personally for your support and positive comments.  

Thank you all so much.  I can't tell you what your support means to me.  

I have not felt the need to write here for years.  2020 has been one hell of a year to say the least.  The clumination of the year find 71 million conservatives being expected to believe, a 2 time presidential canidate (Joe Biden) got more votes than any Presidential canidate in the history of the United States.  The level of propaganda is completely off the charts.  I am gonna hold on making predictions because I am not really sure the United States even exsistist anymore.  If Joe Biden and the Democrats actually succeed in stealing the 2020 election, life in America will never be the same.  They will move the country so far to the left that there will be no coming back from it.  

The Twitter Thought POLICE

By Eron Thomas:

Well here I am again suspended from Twitter LOLOL.   Not really sure why?  I never swore in a post, I never advocated burning down the white house,(no caps for emphasis), never advocated killing anyone, or anything of the sort.  I just got a polite little note that said to review the Twitter Best Practices blah blah blah .  I have put the quote below:

Hello,

We understand that you're contesting an account suspension. Please be sure to read this entire email; you will need to take further action in order to reopen your ticket and trigger a review of your account.

Twitter suspends accounts for a variety of reasons:

• If your account was suspended for aggressive following behavior, you should have received an email notification to the address associated with your Twitter account. You'll need to confirm that you've removed all prohibited following automation from your account, and will stop any manual aggressive following behavior. To expedite your appeal process, please review our Best Practices page if you haven't already, and then reply to this ticket with a confirmation that you understand our policies and will not engage in any prohibited following behavior.

• Please take a minute to review the Twitter Rules.

• If you received an email from admin@twitter.com saying 'you're being suspended' or that we're going delete your account, you're safe; the email is fake. More information here https://support.twitter.com/articles/204820-safety-fake-twitter-emails

• While we strive to avoid mistakes, it's also possible that your account was suspended in error. If after reviewing the Rules, you have no idea why your account was suspended, just reply to this email indicating as much, and we'll take another look at your case. Our apologies if the error turns out to be ours.

Thanks,

Twitter Support

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Responding to this email will reopen this ticket and put your ticket in queue for support. If you do not reply, your case will be closed. Note that you need to reply from the address this mail was sent to. If you use an alias (such as username+alias@gmail.com) to manage your account, ensure that your reply comes from the alias address or your ticket may not be seen by our support staff.

Please note, we cannot accept email attachments at this time; please include all information in the body of your request.

Your request summary is:

You will notice here that it says (if).  There is no clear indication in the whole email what the suspension is actually for.  After reading the Best Practices, I still cannot discern any particular example of how I have violated the “rules”, and there is still no specific example in the email that I received of how I have “violated” the rules.  I have just somehow, in someone’s “opinion” violated them. 

Then it comes to me.  If you are a liberal spouting hate and profanity there really are not Twitter Best Practices.  There are NO suspensions if you are advocating Killing Mitt Romney:  trying to incite a riot if your candidate doesn’t win: calling for the murder of all Jews, or using 4 letter profanities.  There are only Best Practices if you are Gay and Conservative and believe me they discriminate.   Kind of funny don’t you think? 

Well here I sit in Twitter Purgatory, for like the 3^rd time in 6 weeks.  What I am advocating must really be pissing someone off, but then again the truth is never a welcome visitor to the propagandist.

By Eron Thomas:

The howling and feigned outrage on the left regarding the 47 % comment made by Romney in a private fund raising event in Florida is almost comical.  Does anyone out there realize that the Obama administration has for four years been routinely disenfranchising millions of unemployed Americans with the way they have been calculating and reporting the number of under and unemployed Americans?  The newspapers and the television networks are complicit in their absolute silence.

A simple search of the internet https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/USAWFPNA will show that over the last 5 observations there are about 240 million working age Americans in the US.  This means that for every 1% of unemployment 2.4 million Americans are not working.  The administration does not count under or unemployed people who have exhausted the benefits: who are under employed, or who have just given up looking for work.  So for all intent and purposes these people don’t exist.  They are not important enough to the Obama Administration to even be counted anymore.  You might wondering, “Why would they do that?  What do they have to gain?  This kind of calculation artificially lowers the unemployment numbers. 

The currently reported number is 7.8%.  Most in the media know this number is false, but for the purposes of this discussion let’s use that number.  With 240 million working age adults in the US, this number translates to approximately 18.72 million not working.  This is a terrible number mind you but the reality is much worse.  If we use the actual number of 14% for the unemployment number 33.6 million Americans are unemployed, under employed, or have just given up looking for work all together.  This means that 14.88 million Americans have just been written off by the Obama administration.  Think about that for a minute: these folks matter so little to Obama that his administration doesn’t even count them anymore. 

It is one thing for a guy (Romney) to make an indelicate remark in a private fundraiser.  It was a poorly worded remark for which he apologized.  In the not too distant past I remember another presidential candidate who waxed eloquently about mid-westerns clinging to god and guns with antipathy for others.  In my mind these are simple mistakes that anyone could make and I gave both of them a pass on their remarks. 

 It is quite another for the Obama administration to purposely and systematically disenfranchise unemployed Americans by creating an unemployment reporting policy to just zero people out: these kinds of unemployment reporting policies are deceptive and fundamentally wrong.  The reality here is that almost 15 million Americans are struggling to take care of their families and Obama has written them off.  They don’t even count anymore, and all for his political GAIN.  I wonder if anyone other than me can see the irony of the 47% comment now.  Romney’s was a slip of the tongue.  Obama’s is a calculated government policy.  Which is worse?

Just a Terrible President

Eron Thomas:

Obama is just a terrible President.  I have never said that about any President other than Jimmy Carter, and up until now I would say that he was by far the worst President we ever had.  It is staggering to think that Obama could be worse, but he is.  By the way, I am gay, so by the lefts dictums, I am immune to criticism lest you be called a racist, bigoted homophobe.  However, I am sure; I will be called much worst by any leftie that reads this. LOLOLOLOL

Obama is just a terrible President.  I know the lefties will all blow a gasket for me saying that but it is true.  Calling all liberal, LOOK at the country!  Look hard at the country right now.  Do I have to remind you that a great President unites people (Lincoln, FDR, Kennedy, and Regan) for a common purpose to do great things?  A great President finds common ground upon which to build a consensus for the benefit of every American.  A great President makes each and every American feel like they are part of the great experiment that is our Republic.  A great President reaches out to every group of Americans and speaks to their heart to say we are in this together. 

By contrast, Obama tells members of Congress that elections have consequences and, “I won.”  By contrast this President tells the world that the police acted stupidly.  By contrast this President creates war like factions bent on the complete inhalation of their political opponents and the utter destruction of the opposition.  By contrast this President divides to conquer.  Right about now I am being called a F**%K S%%&<S TGHOS THD  by the left and a traitor to boot.  But what I am saying here is the truth.  He is the President not a two bit community organizer in Chicago anymore, he just doesn’t realize it. 

Let’s just look at some great leaders and see what they did in similar situations.  Lincoln had a country divided yet he held the Union together.  In the face of bitter war and the deaths of hundreds of thousands of American he found it within his heart to build consensus pull the country together and the country survived.  FDR inherited a massive depression and yet he pulled the county together.  Kennedy in the face of Nuclear War stood his ground at the Bay of Pigs and pulled the country together and pushed back the USSR.  Regan inherited a complete fiasco from Jimmy Carter and yet not once did he blame the previous administration for the problems that faced the county. He pulled the country together overcame our financial problems and ended the Cold War.   Martin Luther King in the face of vicious racism pulled the country together.  Nelson Mandela pulled South Africa together after years of racism and apartheid.  Think how easy it would have been for South Africa fall into division, violence and civil war were it not for Mandela.

Let’s examine why Obama is so different.  To me the contrast between Obama and a good President is blatantly obvious, but for many American (if the polls are to be believed) there is tremendous confusion.  Obama believes in redistribution which on its face seems like a fair minded, socially acceptable thing.  But you have to realize is that social justice and redistribution is at its very core rotten. First, because it validates and inflames the misery and anger people feel about the perceived injustice in their own lives.  Secondly, anger and hate have always led to destruction not a Utopia.   So redistribution and social justice is really no social just tice at all if you are the disenfranchised from whom the mob is exactly their revenge.  Think of it this way.  Where is the social justice for the millions you have to disenfranchise for social justice?  The concept is an oxymoron.   Throw into the mix Obama’s animus for free market capitalism and his disdain for what he considers the colonial domination of the third world and you can clearly see where his policy of factionalism comes from.  Realize this philosophy of factionalism works very well if you are a community organizer (advocating more mortgages for the poor in the south side of Chicago) not so much when you are supposed to be the leader of the free world.  Not to sound racist, but all the people in the room at a community organizing meeting in the south side of Chicago are probably the same color and socioeconomic group. 

Obama has created a pall of misery over the county.  Our 1^st Amendment right to free speech has all but been suspended because anytime anyone voices an opinion contrary to the Obama “Ministry of Truth” the MSM tears them to pieces.  Our 2^nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms is under attack at every turn.  Just look at Fast & Furious.  I believe without the death of Brian Terry and the Fast & Furious scandal there would be a renewed and robust effort to restrict gun rights in the border state using the violence in Mexico as the impetus.  Citizens don’t even feel like they can put a Romney Ryan bumper sticker on their car for fear the vehicle will be vandalized.  Under this President’s divisive leadership what have we come to?

Let’s just compare the ideals and motives of great Presidents with those of Obama.  A great President believes in the rule of law and American Exceptionalism.  He sees the world quite differently that Obama.  A great President realizes that free market Capitalism has lifted more people out of poverty and misery than any other system in the world.   They believe in the basic tenants of the Constitution.  They believe in limited government.  These may seem like platitudes but they are deep fundamental almost spiritual differences that really matter.   This kind of thinking is so important because it puts the survival of the county first.  It sets the Constitution as an almost sacred document that we all live by.  However, the most critical difference is that when a President believes in American Exceptionalism and the rule of law he seats power to the Constitution, the rule of law, and the people and that creates opportunity for every American. He is great because the country is great. 

By contrasts Obama’s redistribution and social justice pits American against American to build coalitions bent on taking from one group to give to another.  It’s a kind of Socialist Corporatism.  Where big corporation, big unions, big government all sit at the table and decide how to cut up the pie.  They get to decide how much success people have a right too.  Now you can’t just go out and tell folks that because they would reject that kind of governance, so it is important that you build power coalitions.  It is important that you feed the Presidents Cult of Personality as a Robin Hood type figure who is stealing from the rich to give to the poor.  The only problem with that is that Robin Hood was actually stealing excessive taxes from the King John and giving them back to the taxpayers. No matter, the left never worries about confusing the issue with the facts.  The left never worries about what it is true.  The left is only concerned with what appears to be the truth.    

In closing, the belief in the Constitution, freedom and the rule of law builds a great county.  Redistribution and Social Justice build a great Dictator. 

Eron Thomas

The thing I find fascinating is that the conservative Democrats aren't weighting in on this.  They would be howling if a 13 year old African American girl was denied an abortion on demand without parental consent.  It would be front page news in the MSM, and proof that Republicans are racist.  But 450 million to the terror state of Egypt no problem.  The supreme leader has issued the edict and the money should be sent.  Don't they realize how dangerous their group think and speak is. Is it just me or does anyone else see this.  I am old enough to remember when there were a few conservative Democrats who would have worked with the Republicans to stop the transfer of this money.  One other perplexing thing is that it seems obvious from the 2010 election is they are the ones that get punished at the polls for their mindless regurgitation of the White House "Ministry of Truth Speak", not the administration.  Yet they, like a horde of lemmings" follow the Pied Piper of Debtville over the fiscal cliff.  It terrifying for the country and Sad for them.

Why They Lied

Eron Thomas:

https://gayconservatists.webnode.com/

Everyone in the new, cable media are trying to figure out why the administration lied on the Libya attack.  If you look closely at the situation it is obvious for anyone to see.  Let’s just recap shall we.  The attack happened.  They tweeted an apology out before the protest in Cairo even begins.  They stuck to that apology for 16 hours or so.  They attacked the Romney campaign not because he spoke to soon.  They attacked Romney because he was not following the prescribed time line and narrative they had decided to feed to the MSM.  The plan was to apologize before it began.  Blame the movie for about a week then deal with the cover up and real journalist after that. 

Ok, so now you are wondering why this protocol, why do it this way.  I submit to you that they have been handling controversial issues this way for a very long time.  If you review any controversial issues the administration has had you will find the exact same protocol and time line.  Why you are asking yourself.  I am about to share that with you.  The administration knows exactly where most of its supporters get their news.  Most watch ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, Jon Stewart, Jay Leno, David Letterman and The View.  The administration feels if they can control that audience they control the flow of news.  Here is the basic protocol.  They create a cover story that the dupes in the media and the idiot talk show hosts will report adnauseam for approximately a week. Most Americans are very busy.  Their attention span is about a week on most stories.  The smoke screen put out by the MSM gives the administration time to get around to the talk shows and reinforce the cover story.  By the end of the week it really doesn’t matter what the truth is because most people think they know what actually happened.  This explains why Jay Carney said very matter of factly about 1 week after the initial attack “it is self-evident that this was a terrorist attack”, as if to say common guys get with it.  Isn’t is obvious to any right thinking person that this was obviously a terror attack.  What are all you guys stupid?  Now they will send their surrogates around to all the shows including actual news organizations and spin whether they actually lied or not.   If you are watching Fox news or reading any of the blogs, the surrogates are already saying things like, “well we really don’t know exactly when they knew that this was a terror attack”.  The dis-information protocol on the Benghazi attack has been run and is now complete.   The loyal Obama supporters are sure they have the truth about their Supreme Leader.  Fox news and all of the conservatives are scratching their heads saying what do you mean the administration didn’t lie.  Here they are on tape lying threw their teeth.  As the cable news, new media, and blogs buzz with the question of who lied and when,   the story is dead.  The about the first American Ambassador to be kill since the Carter administration is not the lead on any of the network news programs or on the front page of any newspaper in the country.  Done and Done!

I am willing to bet that by the time the 2012 election is held Obama supporters will swear that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan attacked the Libyan embassy and killed the ambassador and Joe Soptic’s wife. 

Why They Lied

Eron Thomas:

https://gayconservatists.webnode.com/

Everyone in the new, cable media are trying to figure out why the administration lied on the Libya attack.  If you look closely at the situation it is obvious for anyone to see.  Let’s just recap shall we.  The attack happened.  They tweeted an apology out before the protest in Cairo even begins.  They stuck to that apology for 16 hours or so.  They attacked the Romney campaign not because he spoke to soon.  They attacked Romney because he was not following the prescribed time line and narrative they had decided to feed to the MSM.  The plan was to apologize before it began.  Blame the movie for about a week then deal with the cover up and real journalist after that. 

Ok, so now you are wondering why this protocol, why do it this way.  I submit to you that they have been handling controversial issues this way for a very long time.  If you review any controversial issues the administration has had you will find the exact same protocol and time line.  Why you are asking yourself.  I am about to share that with you.  The administration knows exactly where most of its supporters get their news.  Most watch ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, Jon Stewart, Jay Leno, David Letterman and The View.  The administration feels if they can control that audience they control the flow of news.  Here is the basic protocol.  They create a cover story that the dupes in the media and the idiot talk show hosts will report adnauseam for approximately a week. Most Americans are very busy.  Their attention span is about a week on most stories.  The smoke screen put out by the MSM gives the administration time to get around to the talk shows and reinforce the cover story.  By the end of the week it really doesn’t matter what the truth is because most people think they know what actually happened.  This explains why Jay Carney said very matter of factly about 1 week after the initial attack “it is self-evident that this was a terrorist attack”, as if to say common guys get with it.  Isn’t is obvious to any right thinking person that this was obviously a terror attack.  What are all you guys stupid?  Now they will send their surrogates around to all the shows including actual news organizations and spin whether they actually lied or not.   If you are watching Fox news or reading any of the blogs, the surrogates are already saying things like, “well we really don’t know exactly when they knew that this was a terror attack”.  The dis-information protocol on the Benghazi attack has been run and is now complete.   The loyal Obama supporters are sure they have the truth about their Supreme Leader.  Fox news and all of the conservatives are scratching their heads saying what do you mean the administration didn’t lie.  Here they are on tape lying threw their teeth.  As the cable news, new media, and blogs buzz with the question of who lied and when,   the story is dead.  The about the first American Ambassador to be kill since the Carter administration is not the lead on any of the network news programs or on the front page of any newspaper in the country.  Done and Done!

I am willing to bet that by the time the 2012 election is held Obama supporters will swear that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan attacked the Libyan embassy and killed the ambassador and Joe Soptic’s wife.